List Of Presidents

Partner with listofpresidents.net

List Of Presidents

The Importance of President Obama's Birth Certificate

Author: Jeffrey R. Camino

There is a great deal of controversy over whether President Obama has the credentials, per the U.S. Constitution, to hold the office of The President of the United States.  On April 27, 2011 (about halfway into his presidency) President Obama produced a Certificate of Live Birth that allegedly validates he was born in Hawaii.  Let's examine this very important issue further...

 

PEOPLE THAT SAY IT IS NOT IMPORTANT

Before I continue, I want to address people that say this is not an important issue, that it just distracts from more important issues, etc.

First, saying that it's a non-issue is demonstrating a complete ignorance about the intent of why that requirement was put into the United States Constitution in the first place.  Keep in mind, we're not talking about some random company policy, we are discussing the highest law in the land: the Constitution of the United States!  Further below I'll discuss why the forefathers included the requirements for the Office of the President, but suffice it to say if we start pushing aside the Constitution, then we are on a very slippery slope indeed.

Many people are claiming that this issue is diverting valuable time away from more important issues, and the President himself said this was becoming a "sideshow".  Frankly, that statement is ludicrous for three main reasons:

1. The only reason there is any attention on this issue at this point in time in the first place is because the President chose not to release the document a long time ago.  He spent over 2 million dollars in legal fees to avoid doing so.  Consequently, much more time, effort, and money has been put into not releasing the document than simply doing so.  That actually should cause any reasonable person to question why it was not released a long time ago.

2. It should not  take up that much time to ask a staff member (or Michelle) to get the document, have it scanned, then hold a 5 minute press conference about it!

3. If President Obama can spend hours on the golf course, basketball court, and fill out a "March Madness" basketball bracket on TV; then surely he can take a few minutes to address the American people and the constitutional requirements of the office he holds.  Saying this is diverting valuable time and that it's the "birthers" to blame is a lame argument by people that either do not see a much bigger issue at hand, or just want to bury their heads in the sand because they also sense there could be more to this than they want to admit.

 

 

AUTHENTICITY OF THE RECENTLY RELEASED DOCUMENT

Substantial questions remain about the authenticity of the birth certificate.  However, anyone that brings this up is immediately labeled as a "birther" that will never be satisfied.  I wonder what similar strategies were used when anyone objected to Hitler's tactics and policies?  Will the American people also let the facts of the matter be squashed because bringing up the issue results in persecution and ridicule?  I fear, for the most part, the answer to that is that most people will.

Though mostly ignored for the aforementioned reasons, experts are presenting compelling evidence suggesting the document is a forgery.  THIS LINK presents some videos that question the authenticity of the document.

In addition to the technical issues, other people point out that President Obama's father is listed to be from "Kenya, East Africa", yet Kenya was not an independent country until 1963 — 2 years after the date of the birth certificate.  Others point out his father's race is listed as "African", yet the term used in the early 60's, when the document was allegedly recorded, was actually "Negro".  They also claim that government agencies that tracked statistics had narrow guidelines of how to record that information so that statistics could be kept.

I am not an expert, so I don't know if perhaps Kenya would still have been a valid option to record on a birth certificate regardless of its official independence and whether or not his father could have been recorded as "African" since he actually was "African".  I would think other birth certificates could be examined and compared to see, though perhaps the odds of finding someone born in Hawaii with a father from Kenya, East Africa are very slim.

 

IS IT A MATTER OF RACE?

This is a good place to interject that this is not a matter of race!  If there were the same questions surrounding anyone — regardless of their color, race, gender, or religion — many people would want to know more.  In fact, though a much lesser issue in terms of the affairs of our nation, recall that President Clinton was under a lot of scrutiny for his affairs with Monica Lewinsky.  George W. Bush was sharply criticized for his behavior during his college years and President Nixon was forced to resign from office for engaging in unlawful behavior that had much less impact on his current presidency than does the issue about President Obama's birth certificate.

There is no doubt that Timothy McVeigh would get equal or more scrutiny if he were president and his policies and credentials were in question.  Indeed it's about a much more important matter: we are really exploring the beliefs, values, and political ideology held by the person holding the most powerful position in the United States and whether or not they are in line with the best interests of the United States!!!

Playing the "race card" about this issue is divisive and only diverts attention where it need not be.  The real attention should be about the Constitution of the United States, whether or not the person holding the highest office in the land is adhering to the law of the land, and the purpose that requirement for being President of the United States is there to begin with...

 

CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE PRESIDENT

The founding fathers of the United States did a fantastic job drawing up our Constitution.  It took them a long time to do so as they carefully thought out, debated, and finally agreed to all that its comprised of.  They carefully added many important things: like establishing the three branches of government, wherein a system of "checks and balances" was put into our governmental system; establishing what congress may and may not do; creating the courts and their function; and ensuring U.S. citizens enjoy freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and so on.

Article II of the Constitution establishes the Office of the President and requirements thereof.  Therein we have the law that someone must be a natural born citizen, age 35, have lived in the U.S. for at least 14 years prior, and so on.

Why were those requirements included?  Were the founders just arbitrarily adding some meaningless law to the Constitution?  No, of course not!!!

So, then, what were they thinking?  It's quite clear if you logically think about it: they were recognizing that it would be in the best interest of the U.S. if they could reasonably ensure that the person holding the highest office in the land was absolutely loyal to the U.S.; thus, all of the beliefs, values, political ideology and consequent decisions that person made always had the best interest of the U.S. in mind.  Now whether or not the policies were always right, at least it could be reasonably assured the right intentions were there.

tmp.jpg

That is why it is an important issue.  If the President of the United States has had substantial influence from another nation's ideas or from a religion that is hateful and opposed to the religion that most of the citizens of the U.S. hold, then it is very important to know that.  In essence, it protects us from "enemies, both foreign and domestic", as it helps us avoid having someone that is really a "spy" of sorts making policy not in the best interest of the U.S.  During the campaign President Obama repeatedly said there would be "change", though the question that was not asked is, "Exactly what kind of change?"

 

WHERE HAS THE PRESS BEEN?

What makes that issue difficult to deal with is that the press is readily accepting the document, though we have to seriously question if the press is doing its job!!!  Why this issue was not investigated while President Obama was running for office rather than actually holding the office is astounding.  Where was the press when there was substantial ambiguity about the man running for President of the United States?

The question should be asked, "Why only now release this document that has been asked for time and time again?"  The mainstream press is not asking that very important question!!!  Was it not provided to make some point that we have no right to know or that it should not be a constitutional requirement?  I can't see either of those reasons settling well with most people.  It was either a blatant act of defiance, or there is another reason.  Frankly, I can not think of any good reason nor have I seen one proposed!

Another important consideration about this matter is this: why isn't the press wanting to know about the college papers President Obama wrote?  While not the "all knowing, all telling" indication of one's beliefs, values, and political ideology, I would think they could weigh into the matter at least some.  Put another way, why is President Obama hiding that information?  In fact, it's still ambiguous to me where President Obama went to school, what he was taught, who his friends are/were, what his friends and teachers have to say about him, etc.

Many employers require that one's work history be valid and ask for official college transcripts conditional to employment, and that is a very reasonable request.  Frankly, the "employers" (the American people via the press) did not do their due diligence concerning Barack Obama.  We really know very little about him.  He was ushered in on a popularity contest where speeches and other factors played a larger role than the substance behind the man.

Had the issue of the birth certificate and such been discussed prior to the presidential election, the American people could have, at that time, made the decision at the polls of whether or not it was an issue.  (Though arguably the founding fathers intended for it be a law, not something we vote on based on "popularity".)  We'll never know how it may have played out, because the press did not do its job and, therefore, the issue is still being dealt with now, after the election. 

As for correcting the problem, to do so would require that the press essentially report on itself about how poor of a job it did, which is not likely to happen.  Also, many people in the mainstream media likely voted for President Obama, therefore they have further motives to ignore this issue.  Except for web sites like this, the issue will not likely get any attention.  If you dare to share this blog, then perhaps you can help.

Consequently, there is still a cloud of doubt about whether or not President Obama is actually legally holding the office of President of the United States.  Now, some people are quick (too quick) to say that it should be a non-issue and that anyone discussing the matter is doing so foolishly.  They mention that our economy is in trouble, we have conflicts going on around the world, and that there are otherwise many other issues to be addressed.  It's for exactly those reasons that this is an important issue!  As noted before, the founding fathers of the United States thought it was quite important!

 

WHY DID IT TAKE THIS LONG TO RELEASE THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE?

Had the document been released a long time ago, questions of whether or not it is legitimate would have long been dismissed or dealt with; but that is far from the case.  I won't rehash some of the points that reasonably question its legitimacy, but I think the main point is worth asking: what, then, was the motivation behind hiding this document for so long?  Why hide a document substantiating ones legal eligibility to be in office (and pay so much money to do so) only to eventually produce it?

Moreover, all too readily accepting a document that was produced years later and still has a lot of questions about its authenticity is foolish at best, and hints of not wanting to address the deeper issue at hand: who is the man holding the highest office in the nation, what are his values, what is his political ideology, and therefore what is his agenda?

Time will tell how this all plays out, though I'm not sure if it will ever be settled.  Should the Lord tarry, it could go down as one of the most unsolved conspiracy theories ever.  Who shot Kennedy, what happened at Roswell, did President Obama ever legally hold the office of President of the United States... ?

Now you may be asking, "What does this have to do with Bible prophecy?"  It could actually have a lot to do with that, as discussed in a previous article entitled, "Where Is President Obama Leading Us?".

###

 

 

Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/politics-articles/the-importance-of-president-obamas-birth-certificate-4685751.html

About the Author

Jeffrey R. Camino lives in a suburb of Dallas, TX with his wife and six children.  He has studied Bible prophecy for several years and is listed in Who's Who of Bible Prophecy.  His passion to share God's Word coupled with his writing talents lend themselves nicely to his books, which are exceptionally easy-to-read, well researched and, most of all, biblically sound.  His new book, Pray That You May Escape, is receiving great reviews from people all over and is well on its way to becoming a huge hit within the Christian community.

When he isn't studying or writing about Bible prophecy, Jeffrey works hard to support his large family, which he is always quick to mention he feels blessed to have.  Jeffrey is Founder and President of NorthStar Solutions, LLC, a popular e-commerce company that builds web sites and provides e-commerce solutions for other businesses worldwide.  Founded in 1994, NorthStar Solutions sells thousands of titles, particularly software and books, as well as other types of products that fit in with the moral integrity of the business.  Jeffrey also programs software titles of his own.

His working career started in the U.S. Air Force at the age of seventeen and during that time Jeffrey received a highly competitive Congressional Nomination to the Air Force Academy; but ultimately God had other plans for his life.  After serving in the Air Force for four years, saving money for college and receiving an honorable discharge, he attended Kansas State University.  Jeffrey worked himself through college and after completing his degree in Business Administration pursued building his business.  Soon he found himself busy running a successful software/e-commerce business.

An Easy Way to Remember the US Presidents

Author: Jimmy Cox

Every American should know the names of the Presidents. First we list the Presidents and find substitute words for their names. Beside each president write words of similar sound. The degree of similarity in sound is an individual matter. For the person who relies greatly on the aid of sound, the substituted word must be very like that of the word to be memorized.

Then we make up a little story which includes these substituted words in order. The story might run somewhat like this:

In Washington Adam was jeopardized by a mad monster. Adam and Jack ran to the bureau, but in their hurry they broke a tile or poked a tailor. They filmed more buildings, pierced by a cannon which was linked by John to a grand tree.

The haze over garden and field sheltered Arthur, who cleaved his way in a hurry. He cleaved mockingly as he cried: "A rose taffeta dress will hardly be the right thing in a college; but whoever desires rose veils may truly wear them?"

The underlined words mean:
Washington -- Washington
Adam -- Adams
jeopardized -- Jefferson
mad -- Madison
monster -- Monroe
Adam -- Adams
Jack -- Jackson
bureau -- Van Buren
hurry -- Harrison
tile -- Tyler
poked -- Polk
tailor -- Taylor
filmed more -- Fillmore
pierced -- Pierce
by a cannon -- Buchanan
linked -- Lincoln
John -- Johnson
grand -- Grant
haze -- Hayes
garden and field -- Garfield
Arthur -- Arthur
cleaved -- Cleveland
hurry -- Harrison
cleaved -- Cleveland
mockingly -- McKinley
rose -- Roosevelt
taffeta -- Taft
will -- Wilson
hardly -- Harding
college -- Coolidge
whoever -- Hoover
rose veils -- Roosevelt

Use this small story, and you will know the Presidents of the United States.

When we work out a story embodying these substitute words just as we did in the case of the states, except that in this instance we must use them in historical order. The story might run somewhat like this:

In Washington Adam was jeopardized by a mad monster. Adam and Jack ran to the bureau, but in their hurry they broke a tile or poked a tailor. They filmed more buildings, pierced by a cannon which was linked by John to a grand tree.

The haze over garden and field sheltered Arthur, who cleaved his way in a hurry. He cleaved mockingly as he cried: "A rose taffeta dress will hardly be the right thing in a college; but whoever desires rose veils may truly wear them?

This story is somewhat harder to learn than the one about the states, because of its prescribed order. Nevertheless, one can learn this list without special effort in half an hour, while to learn the Presidents without such aid takes much longer.

Every American is expected to know not only the names of the Presidents in chronological order but also the dates of their terms. The latter, too, is considerably lightened by mnemonics, but before we attempt it we need further preparation. We will return to its solution in a later chapter.

The following interesting version of the list of Presidents was worked out by Mr. Edwin C. Silvey. It is excellent in that it avoids many connecting words. This series, a masterpiece in phonetics, is also easy to learn:

Washing done, a dame gave her son medicine. We know Washington Adams Jefferson Madison Monroe at times that son, a wine bum, had his son dial (telephone) her: Adams Jackson Van Buren Harrison Tyler broke; tell her fill my purse By cannon and gun Polk Taylor Fillmore Pearce Buchanan Lincoln John's son groaned to haze our field. Are they Johnson Grant Hayes Gaineld Arthur Gleeful and merry, son? Cleve and Mack when they rose felt Cleveland Harrison Cleveland McKinley Roosevelt
tough. Well, son, Hearty! College over. Who's fooled. Taft Wilson Harding Coolidge Hoover Roosevelt

Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/self-improvement-articles/an-easy-way-to-remember-the-us-presidents-405530.html

About the Author

Finally A Proven Way To Improve Your Memory So That You'll Remember Every Thing You Want To Click Here For Free Online Ebook http://www.improvingmemory.net/

2009 International Best-Dressed list By Vanity Fair

Author: Mabel Xie

Vanity Fair recently released the 2009 International Best-Dressed list which includes 8 chapters. Here this article has all detailes

Chapter One: First Ladies
First Lady Michelle Obama
First Lady Carla Bruni- Sarkozy

America’s First Lady: Michelle Obama
2009 Representative Dress: The dress for the inauguration
Favorite Boutique: Chicago, Ikram
Favorite shopping site: J. Crew
Classic single item: cardigan jacket
Jewelry: Pearl Jewelry
Shoes Brand: Jimmy Choo, Puma, Lanvin
Selected Reasons: She have been dedicated to developing the education and improving the medical and health care system as well as the veteran policy.

France’s Firse Lady: Lady Carla Bruni- Sarkozy
Fashion Idols: Jacqueline Kennedy, Audrey Hepburn
2009 Representative Dresses: Stefano Pilat violet dress, Yves Saint Laurent “Edition Soir” for the Dîner de la Mode gala
Favorite Boutique: Dior
Must-Have Single Items: Flat ballet shoes
Selected Reasons: She has been desicated to Charities and Anti-HIV Funds


Chapter Two: International Best-Dressed List: Women
H.R.H Princess Letizia of Asturias
Chiara Clemente: Film Maker
Penélope Cruz: Actress
Kathy Freston: Writer
Agnes Gund: The curator of the Museum of Modern Arts
Anne Hathaway: Actress
Aliciakeys: singer, actress, songwriter
H.H Sheikha Mozah of Qatar
Kelly Ripa: Compere
Lizzie Tisch: Private Banker


Penélope Cruz: Spanish Actress
Fashion Idols: Audrey Hepburn, Anouk Aimée
2009 favorite clothes: Haider Ackermann short coat
Favorite Brands: Chanel, Dior, Jean Paul Gaultier?Armani?
Favorite Boutique: Maxfield?LA
Favorite Retro Second-hand shops: Lily et Cie, Decades, LA
Favorite Jewelry: The ring from grandmother
Favorite shoes: Christian Loubouti
Favorite Handbags: Chanel handbags
Favorite Perfume: Santa Maria Novella
Favorite sunglasses: Retro Ray-Ban Sunglasses

Anne Hathaway, Actress, New York, America
Personale Style: Hollywood Style
2009 Representative Dress: Armani Privé Silver Dress at 2009 Oscar Award
Favorite Shoes: Christian Louboutin
Favorite Perfume: Lancôme,Magnifique


Chapter Three: International Best-Dressed List-Men
Tiki Barber-NBC journalist, the founder of venture capital firm
Arpad Busson: Financier,
Daniel Craic: Actor
Matteo Marzotto: entrepreneur, president of ENIT
Barack Obama: The American President
Ogden Phipps II: Private Equity Investors
Brad Pitt: Actor
Roo Rogers: Environmental entrepreneur, Entrepreneur of OZOlab
Alejandro Santo Domingo: Investor,
CY Twombly: Artist

Barack Obama: The American President
2009 the most special fashion item: Hart Schaffner Marx Suit whose inner pocket is printed with “specially made for Barack Obama ”
Frequently-used items: Secret Service baseball cap, black sport pants, Gray Shirts
Favorite Shoes: Cole Haan Dress Shoes, Asics white sport shoes
Favorite Sunglasses: Ray-Ban 3217
Favorite watch: Jorg Gray 6500
Favorite shopping site: Secret Service

Brad Pitt: Hollywood Movie Star
Favorite Designer: Tom Ford
Representative Dresses: Scarfs and caps
Favorite Shoes: Sanuk, Monk?
Favorite Jewelry: David Yurman Black Diamond Ring
Favorite Sunglasses: Tom Ford, David Yurman, Ray-Ban?
Favorite Watches: Tag Heuer Watches, Rolex Watches;

Chapter Four: Fashion Professionals

Georgina Chapman: Founder and Designer of Marchesa
Tory Burch: Designer
Mathilde Meyer-Agostinelli:  Prada’s Marketing Communications Director in France
David Lauren: Vice President of Polo Ralph Lauren, the head of Marketing and Public Relationship;
Candy Pratts Price: the fashion executive director of Style.com
Rachel Roy: Designer
Stacey Bendet: Designer and founder of Alice & Olivi
Franca Sozzani: The chief editor of Vogue and L’Uomo Vogue(Italian Version)
Ali Hewson: One of the founders of Edun Fashion Company and Nude Skin-Care Products Company

Chapter Five: Siblings

Jane Lauder: President of Origins; Aerin Lauder: Vice Director and Creative Director of Estée Lauder

Stavros Niarchos and Eugénie Niarchos: Jewelry Designers of Gaia Repossi

Chapter Six: Couples

Paloma Cuevas, Jewelry designer of Yanes and Enrique Ponce, professional matador
Diana Taylor, managing director of Wolfensohn and Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of New York; the fouder of Bloomberg L.P.
Natalia Vodianona, Model and Justin Portman, artist
Shelley Wanger, the editou of Knopf and Pantheon and David Mortimer, the president of U.S. House of Representatives

Chapter Seven: Hall of Fame
Liliane Bettencourt, principal shareholder of L’Oréal
Count Manfredi Della Gheraradesca, artistic consultant, curator
Catherine Deneuve, actress, model
Lapo Elkann, inventive entrepreneurs, the founder abd president of Italy Independent Fashion Company and Independent Ideas, President of LA Holding and also one of the founders
Renée Zellweger, actor

Chapter Eight: Fashion Originals
Peter Beard, photographer, artist
Duchess of Alba
Nicky Haslam, interior designer
IKé UDé,, Artist, the founder of Arude magazine
Bruce Weber, photographer, artist, film maker

Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/art-and-entertainment-articles/2009-international-bestdressed-list-by-vanity-fair-1198757.html

About the Author

The author publishes articles about replica handbags and replica rolex watches at 99handbags.com and luxury watch reviews at idolreplicas.info

Should a Woman be President?

Author: John Nilson

Nowadays, it seems to be quite natural that a woman should be and can potentially be a President, since she does not differ either mentally or morally from a great number of men which traditionally dominate in politics and social life. It is obvious that a woman is also a useful member of the political society. Moreover, some political and philosophical concepts and views of a female leadership are more stable, informative and logical. In fact, this is the result of the observations based on the real life activities and experience than on political data and doctrine.
Before speaking about modern facts, I should draw your attention to the fact that our history knows a large quantity of women, who became the leaders of their countries, reached the highest points in the political ladder. Here are just simple examples, taken from Wikipedia: Indira Gandy (1917-1984) - the Prime minister of India (1966-1977 and 1980-1984), Violeta Chamorro - the President of Nicaragua and all of Latin America, Maria Estella Martinez de Peron – the first woman President of Argentina (1974-1976), Margaret Thatcher – the first female Prime Minister of Great Britain (1979-1990), Waira Wike-Freiberg – the President of Latvia since 1999, Gloria Macapagal - the President of Philippines since 2001, Angela Merkel – the chancellor of Germany since 2005. And here is only a small list of names that are noted in history.
Speaking about present day situation, it is worthy of mention a very famous woman, Hillary Clinton. Ferrous character and will have not allowed her to lose any serious battle in her life, she has got used to hold a blow and not to incline under the load of problems. Hillary is a very ambitious woman. In the American political life, Hillary looks like a bright and outstanding figure. She has energetic, full of enthusiasm supporters and no less sharp adjusted opponents.
Speaking about her foreign policy, observers underline that Clinton started to promote her own position that is different from that of the current administration not by chance, and it is not because the rate of republicans falls down day by day. Not entirely right policy of republicans is the primary goal of her appearance on political arena. In most of her interviews, Hillary Clinton criticizes the foreign policy of George Bush in Iraq, Afghanistan, North Korea and Iran. As for Iraq, she supposes that the gradual withdrawal of the American troops is absolutely necessary. By the way, she underlines that the protection of human rights is in our interests just to move forward the freedom and principles of democracy. Moreover, she is sure that they should restore the relations between other countries (cited in The American Conservative, March27,2006)
She correctly describes the world we live in: development of terrorists network; growth of weapon supplies; situation in North Korea, openly testing rockets and nuclear weapon; active position of Iran, elaborative own nuclear potential; civil war in Iraq etc (The American Conservative, March27,2006). She earnestly underlines (Breitbart.com, Oct.31, 2006):
First, and most obviously, we must by word and deed renew
internationalism for a new century. We must value diplomacy
as well as a strong military. We should not hesitate to
engage in the world’s most difficult conflicts on a
diplomatic front.
That is why, agreeing with her policy, seventy percents of the American electors are ready to give their votes for the candidate of female sex on presidential elections of 2008, and 62 percents consider that a woman can govern America (cited in ABC News, Sept.27,2005). Geena Davis portrayed this question in ABC drama, saying:
I think we should just be talking about the person who is
the president, rather than their sex.
Greater part of electors has already determined with their sympathies and they are absolutely sure that democratic senator from the state New York Hillary Clinton, who has lived in the White house for eight years though in other status, must be on the post of the president. Others, traditionally voting for republicans, offer the Secretary of State Condolisa Rice as a candidate on the presidential arm-chair. But it is up to voters to decide as their general policy and leadership of these two female candidates are absolutely opposite, because Condolisa Rice is the main Bush’s sticker.
Comparing Hillary Clinton with other female leaders I should say that her political views and directions are respectively right. For example, one more woman, one more strong character – Margaret Thatcher. Certain political, ideological and moral options, which were conducted or aimed to conduct by Margaret Thatcher, and also her specific style of guidance – here are the key success of this woman. Here political philosophy is also interesting. Its base is made up by several elements. It is an apologetics of free enterprise and personal initiative. A direct financial benefit, desire to “arrange life as good as possible on your own and for the family” is one of the stimulus that Thatcher described. Being on the post of the Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher undertook energetic efforts on the reformation of the British economy and whole society. Many state companies were privatized with the purpose of increase of economy efficiency. In numerous conflicts, Thatcher showed herself as a decisive politician and a great leader of the state, involving all of soldiery and diplomatic possibilities, for renewal of sovereignty of Great Britain.
Thatcher deserved a nickname “iron lady” thanks to her decisive actions for the inflexible following of a selected course, in spite of verbal attacks and criticism.
But all in all, the common idea is that a woman-president will manage much better with problems in a social sphere, especially in health protection and educational system, than a man. Speaking about defense, no doubt a woman is trusted not greatly, but it does not mean that a woman gains no understanding in martial law. Anyway, sex or it is better to say gender does not matter in this case.
The picture of presidential elections points out a long train of womanish victories in different countries: Angel Merkel in Germany, Waira Wike-Freiberg in Latvia, Gloria Macapagal on Philippines. As the experience of the last years shows, women win quite often on the elections in the states, where authoritarian leaders governed for a long time or civil cold war took place, for example on Philippines, in Indonesia, Nicaragua, finally, in Chile and Liberia.
However, the womanish charm only is not enough for victory: a candidate for a presidency must have a successful career equally competing with men. All the listed names of female Presidents are those women, who have the common idea of governing their country. They mostly fight for reconstruction of relations between countries, normalizing of economic situation and of course, extermination of problems in the sphere of health care and education. That is why, hoping that a woman will smooth out contradictions in the society better than a man, people vote for a woman.
So summing everything said before and all the facts, I can say that this information gives a clear portrait of a modern woman leader of a country and proves that every highly educated woman having a goal and aspiration for reaching it can become a bright head of the state.
But there is still one more question: “Should a woman be a President?”. To my mind the concept of woman president is something speculative, going beyond the generally accepted rules and at the best subject to the theoretical and philosophical comprehension. Our society is still hardened in the patriarchal character. That is why this concept is examined as an exception and it sis often not mentioned in general.
According to objective tests of possibility, a woman does not have limitations for implementation of duties of a president. Moreover, some researches, conducted by scientists showed that in a number of cases a womanish paradigm of management, based on the non-hierarchical system, is lying on the ground before masculine. A woman generates more strong connections, comes from “life logic”, she has close connection with nature that is especially important at the beginning of the XXI century, when a question of planet survival sharply stands before us.
However, all these facts have never been taken into account, but the point is that considerably higher requirements were preferred to a woman at all levels of management. So, it is obvious that to reach a Presidency in any case, in any country and under different circumstances is quite difficult for any woman of the state.

Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/womens-issues-articles/should-a-woman-be-president-281926.html

About the Author

Irina Nelson is the author of this article. You can find useful tips for custom essay writing on her website Term Papers

KM Lists’ Email Blast Service Offers Affordable, Reliable Email Marketing and Campaign Management

Author: KM Lists

As more businesses work to reduce direct marketing expenses while increasing qualified leads, one company has introduced a way to cut costs on businesses’ email marketing expenses while increasing the success of their campaigns.

KM Lists, a leading direct marketing company that provides targeted mailing & email lists, is now offering email broadcasting, a new email blast service for affordable email campaign management.

The newly-introduced Email Broadcasting offers businesses of all sizes and industries complete email campaign management for an affordable $0.10 per email delivery.  According to Pam Holden, Vice President of KM Lists, the service also alleviates the hassles of implementing and managing email marketing campaigns, while working to increase the response rate of future campaigns.

“To take advantage of Email Broadcasting, a business simply provides us with the desired email list and message.  From there, we implement the email marketing campaign and handle all of the back-end analysis,” explains Pam Holden, Vice President of KM Lists. “The email blast service includes email list management services, providing clients with a list of ‘suspect addresses’ so that lists can be updated for the next blast.”

According to Holden, one of the most exciting features of KM List’s Email Broadcasting is its ability to provide enhanced business intelligence.

“With advanced reporting capabilities, the Email Broadcasting system allows us to provide clients with data to help predict the results of future campaigns,” Holden reports.  “This insightful look into a campaign’s success rate offers many companies an unprecedented level of business intelligence for a significant return on investment.”

Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/direct-mail-articles/km-lists-email-blast-service-offers-affordable-reliable-email-marketing-and-campaign-management-1761477.html

About the Author

For more information about KM Lists’ email blast service, please call 1-800-635-5833 or visit http://www.kmlists.com.

Since 1987, KM Lists has been providing Superior Lists...with Personal Service at Affordable Prices! At KM Lists we work for you, handling your mailing list needs from beginning to end. Our vast wealth of knowledge enables us to present options to the client and discuss what is in their best interest by recommending a specific mailing, phone, and fax or email list that best meets client needs and explain why.

Syndicate content